From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sunset.davemloft.net (unknown [74.93.104.97]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762EEDDF15 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 17:01:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 00:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20080424.000131.193689574.davem@davemloft.net> To: paulus@samba.org Subject: Re: LMB regression... From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <18448.12058.743037.267216@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20080423.232419.193712136.davem@davemloft.net> <18448.12058.743037.267216@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Paul Mackerras Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 16:56:26 +1000 > David Miller writes: > > > Specifically, you removed the aligning of the size argument given to > > lmb_add_region() in the lmb allocators, and that is critical when > > allocating many small chunks, we run out of LMB slots otherwise > > and allocations start failing. > > Sorry. It's still there in lmb_alloc_nid_unreserved but I lost the > one in __lmb_alloc_base. Are you going to send a fix to Linus, or > will I include it in the pull request I'm going to send tomorrow? I've got it, see my other email.