From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416F7DE389 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:11:09 +1000 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] AMCC PPC440EPx/sequoia stability question... Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:06:17 +0200 References: <480EADF4.2020706@verizon.net> <200804240636.12349.sr@denx.de> <1209038406.2946.20.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> In-Reply-To: <1209038406.2946.20.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200804241506.17386.sr@denx.de> Cc: u-boot-users@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 24 April 2008, Josh Boyer wrote: > > This depends. When the bootwrapper version is used then yes, the kernel > > should get changed. This is because the bootwrapper detects the SDRAM > > size from the DDR2 controller and passes it to Linux. > > > > Without bootwrapper no changes are needed, since U-Boot already passes > > the corrected memory size to Linux (totalsize-4k currently). > > Hm. Given that AMCC ships the boards with an older U-Boot that requires > cuImages, I think we'll need to patch the wrapper. Yes, this should be done too. I forgot about it since I usually don't use the wrapper. > Does 440GRx share > this same errata? I would think so. Yep. Same problem on 440GRx. Best regards, Stefan ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: office@denx.de =====================================================================