From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
i2c@lm-sensors.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 14:18:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080427141856.7725e877@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <480F390A.90707@scram.de>
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:34 +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> > Jochen, I'm a bit confused by the dependencies that exist - or not -
> > between these 7 patches you sent at once. I thought they had to be
> > applied in sequence but it seems not? And some of them should
> > apparently go through me i2c tree but others (e.g. [7/7]) not?
>
> [1/7] and [2/7] are forward ports of patches from you. I'm currently
> just running a make allmodconfig compile to check if it really caught
> all affected i2c drivers.
>
> These are the patches we are talking about.
>
> [3/7] is the OF helper stuff which translates between OF names and
> i2c types. It does NOT translate OF names to module names, but relies
> on [1/7] to do so. Without [1/7], [3/7] still applies, but module
> auto loading won't work.
>
> This has been applied to 2.6.26.
>
> > I would appreciate if you could summarize quickly which patches depend
> > on others in which way. If we can make smaller subsets of patches, that
> > will be easier for me to review and push upstream on my limited time.
>
> [4/7] is the patch from Jon Smirl to convert i2c-mpc to OF. This relies
> on [3/7] instead of Jons initial OF-autoloading patches you didn't like.
> As there were no comments at all, I would however postpone this to 2.6.27.
>
> [5/7] is the cleanup patch (originating from you) which completely removes
> old driver matching scheme. This should probably wait until 2.6.27, as well.
> This relies on [1/7] and [2/7].
>
> [6/7] and [7/7] are a new driver and depend on [3/7]. This can wait for 2.6.27,
> as well (i would rather like to see those in -mm to get more testing, though).
Thanks for the summary. Right now I'm working on [1/7] and [2/7] to get
something ready to go upstream in the next few days. Probably only a
part of [2/7] can go there quickly, non-trivial cases (e.g. ivtv) will
have to wait until rc2 or later. I also agree with you that [5/7]
should be delayed for now, we need to make sure that no driver is left
using the old device/driver matching scheme, and that can't possibly be
done before rc2 at best.
I will post the 2 updated patches for review and testing as soon as I
am done.
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-27 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200804171708.32847.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
[not found] ` <20080418235451.2643183b@i1501.lan.towertech.it>
[not found] ` <20080419113417.19f5567a@hyperion.delvare>
[not found] ` <4809EF23.7070902@scram.de>
[not found] ` <20080419162358.746b714c@hyperion.delvare>
2008-04-19 16:43 ` [PATCH] rtc-pcf8563: Add device ids table Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-21 11:56 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-21 12:12 ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-23 11:09 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 11:35 ` Stefan Roese
2008-04-23 11:45 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-22 14:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 11:16 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 12:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 12:47 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-23 13:26 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-04-23 13:46 ` Jon Smirl
2008-04-27 12:18 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-04-23 13:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-23 13:11 ` Jon Smirl
2008-04-17 15:02 Laurent Pinchart
2008-04-17 15:05 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080427141856.7725e877@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jochen@scram.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).