From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78318DDFB0 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:46:34 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:46:23 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call Message-ID: <20080429184623.GA23654@lst.de> References: <18454.35824.527711.355488@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras , Christoph Hellwig , mtk.manpages@gmail.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:40:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > This probably depends a bit on the performance of the system in > question. Did you measure it - for example - on a 50 MHz MPC850 ? You got a 64bit kernel to run on a MPC850? wow :) Not sure what the slowest supported 64bit cpu is (RS64-II?), but Paul might be right and in this case it really doesn't matter.