From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpc i2c driver, compare to NO_IRQ instead of zero
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 18:29:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080502182917.41dc560e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e4733910805020902ga4f05b3nfd2221511ec2ebba@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jon,
On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:02:27 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> New version with your fix.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> index bbe787b..b141057 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c
> @@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static int i2c_wait(struct mpc_i2c *i2c, unsigned
> timeout, int writing)
Long lines folded, patch doesn't apply...
> u32 x;
> int result = 0;
>
> - if (i2c->irq == 0)
> + if (i2c->irq == NO_IRQ)
> {
> while (!(readb(i2c->base + MPC_I2C_SR) & CSR_MIF)) {
> schedule();
> @@ -329,10 +329,9 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> i2c->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (i2c->irq < 0) {
> - result = -ENXIO;
> - goto fail_get_irq;
> - }
> + if (i2c->irq < 0)
> + i2c->irq = NO_IRQ; /* Use polling */
> +
After this change, label fail_get_irq is unused so you should remove
it. gcc should have told you, didn't it?
> i2c->flags = pdata->device_flags;
> init_waitqueue_head(&i2c->queue);
>
> @@ -344,7 +343,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto fail_map;
> }
>
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> if ((result = request_irq(i2c->irq, mpc_i2c_isr,
> IRQF_SHARED, "i2c-mpc", i2c)) < 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR
> @@ -367,7 +366,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return result;
>
> fail_add:
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
> fail_irq:
> iounmap(i2c->base);
> @@ -384,7 +383,7 @@ static int fsl_i2c_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> i2c_del_adapter(&i2c->adap);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> - if (i2c->irq != 0)
> + if (i2c->irq != NO_IRQ)
> free_irq(i2c->irq, i2c);
>
> iounmap(i2c->base);
>
>
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-02 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-21 20:07 [PATCH] mpc i2c driver, compare to NO_IRQ instead of zero Jon Smirl
2008-01-24 22:32 ` [i2c] " Jon Smirl
2008-01-24 22:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-01-24 23:07 ` Jon Smirl
2008-01-25 17:13 ` Jon Smirl
2008-02-19 16:42 ` Jean Delvare
2008-04-25 9:43 ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-02 14:23 ` Jon Smirl
2008-05-02 14:46 ` Jean Delvare
2008-05-02 16:02 ` Jon Smirl
2008-05-02 16:29 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-05-02 17:19 ` Jon Smirl
2008-05-02 20:27 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080502182917.41dc560e@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).