From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA84DDDEF for ; Tue, 13 May 2008 07:35:38 +1000 (EST) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so1897861fga.39 for ; Mon, 12 May 2008 14:35:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 01:35:29 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: add support for MPC86xx CPUs Message-ID: <20080512213529.GA27087@zarina> References: <20080512185206.GA25818@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <64629276-8337-4FFE-B3E1-306678BF179D@kernel.crashing.org> <20080512205303.GA14198@zarina> <4828AFBD.1040501@freescale.com> <4828B012.9090805@freescale.com> <20080512211856.GA21532@zarina> <4828B4BB.2020403@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 In-Reply-To: <4828B4BB.2020403@freescale.com> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wim Van Sebroeck Reply-To: cbouatmailru@gmail.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:20:59PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: >> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:01:06PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: >>> Scott Wood wrote: >>> >>>> It avoids confusion. I vote for renaming. >>> Me too. How about fsl_wdt.c? >> >> fsl_wdt sounds too generic, I think it would conflict with >> at least booke_wdt.c.. no? > > Yeah, that makes sense. What's the difference between booke_wdt.c and > mpc83xx_wdt.c? They're completely different watchdogs... -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2