From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e34.co.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE800DDF15 for ; Thu, 15 May 2008 06:32:57 +1000 (EST) Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4EKTgIL017755 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 16:29:42 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m4EKWsX3096444 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:32:54 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m4EKWqtB024271 for ; Wed, 14 May 2008 14:32:53 -0600 Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 13:32:51 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Alexey Dobriyan Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 - kernel panic at inet_create() on powerpc Message-ID: <20080514203251.GF8812@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20080514010129.4f672378.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <482B066F.4010605@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080514160705.GB8812@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20080514200546.GA4802@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080514200546.GA4802@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kamalesh Babulal , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andrew Morton , davem@davemloft.net, Balbir Singh Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:05:46AM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:07:05AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 09:04:07PM +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 kernel panics on powerpc, while running ltp test over it. > > > I have attached the gdb output of the pc and lr registers. The patch > > > list_for_each_rcu-must-die-networking.patch points to changes made > > > to the same lines listed by the gdb output. > > > > Hmmm.... Does the panic go away when this patch is reverted? > > Yes. OK, am awake now, apologies for my confusion. Not sure -what- state I was in when generating and validating the original... Thanx, Paul