From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [POWERPC] sysdev: implement FSL GTM support
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:35:53 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520143553.GA22450@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520143234.GA19707@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 06:32:34PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 09:20:50AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>>>> This is explained in the .c file with a kernel doc. Basically the
> >>>> difference is that timer16 could silently crop the precision, while
> >>>> utimer16 could not thus explicitly accepts u16 argument (max. timer
> >>>> interval with usec precision fits in u16).
> >>>
> >>> Maybe I'm confused what the utility is of cropping the precision in
> >>> this
> >>> way is. I'd also say that _timer16 is poorly named to convey the
> >>> behavior. I'm not sure what to call it because I still dont get
> >>> exactly
> >>> why you'd want the precision cropped.
> >>
> >> Precision matters for FHCI-like drivers, when driver, for example,
> >> schedule transactions via the GTM timers, and there timings matters
> >> a lot.
> >>
> >> Though, timer16 crops the precision _only_ if usecs > 65535, so FHCI
> >> _can_ still use the _timer16 (because FHCI does not request intervals
> >>> 65535). But I implemented two function because:
> >>
> >> 1. I think we don't need unnecessary stuff in the ISRs (this is weak
> >> argument since I didn't measure the impact).
> >> 2. I wanted to make the API clear (seem to fail this undertaking :-),
> >> which functions will behave exactly the way you asked it (utimer16),
> >> and which functions will _silently_ crop the precision (timer16)
> >> (if asked for 1001000 usecs, it will give you ~~1001000, depending
> >> on the GTM frequency).
> >
> > I'm fine w/having both. I think they are poorly named. I'd also call
> > them _set_timer but that's just me.
> >
> > Maybe something w/the term _exact_ in the name. Is it the case w/the
> > precise form we'd have no prescaling (if so maybe a comment in the API
> > about that would help clarity)?
>
> We're always prescale [to 1000000 MHz for usec precision].
-MHz
+Hz
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-19 17:45 [PATCH 0/7] Patches for Kumar's powerpc-next tree Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] [POWERPC] sysdev: implement FSL GTM support Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 6:04 ` Kumar Gala
2008-05-20 12:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 13:15 ` Kumar Gala
2008-05-20 14:08 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 14:20 ` Kumar Gala
2008-05-20 14:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 14:35 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-05-20 14:24 ` Grant Likely
2008-05-20 12:41 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 13:16 ` Kumar Gala
2008-05-20 14:38 ` Timur Tabi
2008-05-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] [POWERPC] QE: add support for QE USB clocks routing Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-20 4:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-05-20 12:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19 17:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] [POWERPC] QE: prepare QE PIO code for GPIO LIB support Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19 17:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] [POWERPC] QE: implement support for the GPIO LIB API Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-10 16:15 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-11 12:29 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-11 13:52 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-11 23:42 ` [PATCH] powerpc/QE: use arch_initcall to probe QUICC Engine GPIOs Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-24 15:05 ` Kumar Gala
2008-05-19 17:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] [POWERPC] 83xx: new board support: MPC8360E-RDK Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19 17:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] [POWERPC] booting-without-of: add FHCI USB, FSL MCU, FSL UPM and GPIO LEDs bindings Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19 17:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] [POWERPC] qe_lib: switch to the cpm_muram implementation Anton Vorontsov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-23 16:38 [PATCH 0/7] Patches for Kumar's powerpc-next tree Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-23 16:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] [POWERPC] sysdev: implement FSL GTM support Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-10 16:08 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080520143553.GA22450@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=timur@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).