From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp105.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.204]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44C51DDFA5 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 13:45:08 +1000 (EST) From: David Brownell To: Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] spi: split up spi_new_device() to allow two stage registration. Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:17:13 -0700 References: <20080516193054.28030.35126.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <20080516193608.28030.34968.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> In-Reply-To: <20080516193608.28030.34968.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200805211717.13206.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, fabrizio.garetto@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 16 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > > This patch splits the allocation and registration portions of code out > of spi_new_device() and creates three new functions; spi_alloc_device(), > spi_register_device(), and spi_device_release(). I have no problem with the first two, but why the last? If the devices are always allocated by spi_alloc_device() as they should be -- probably through an intermediary -- the only public function necessary for that cleanup should be the existing spi_dev_put(). - Dave