From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.92]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1B87DDF0F for ; Sun, 25 May 2008 03:45:55 +1000 (EST) From: David Brownell To: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] spi: Add OF binding support for SPI busses Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 10:45:47 -0700 References: <20080516193054.28030.35126.stgit@trillian.secretlab.ca> <48384D13.6010608@scram.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <200805241045.47448.david-b@pacbell.net> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net, fabrizio.garetto@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Saturday 24 May 2008, Grant Likely wrote: > > Isn't the same true for drivers/of/gpio.c or drivers/of/of_i2c.c, as well? > > I would argue 'yes!' ... all the more reason to have the SPI glue go there too, matching the ACPI/PCI precedent as well as those others!