From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.48]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D5FDE010 for ; Wed, 28 May 2008 07:34:41 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Roland McGrath To: luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support In-Reply-To: Luis Machado's message of Friday, 23 May 2008 15:12:27 -0300 <1211566348.15367.15.camel@gargoyle> References: <1211391577.6232.15.camel@gargoyle> <18484.60888.981390.893747@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080522064613.088AB26FA24@magilla.localdomain> <1211566348.15367.15.camel@gargoyle> Message-Id: <20080527213435.3DE0126FA1C@magilla.localdomain> Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 14:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ppc-dev , Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > Kumar was just mentioning this post a few messages ago: > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-May/055745.html > > That is a very interesting approach to handle all the differences > between each processor's architecture, and a much cleaner way to set the > facilities we want than the current interface we have. Do you know what > is the status of this work? Did it move any further? prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com was going to look into this. I don't think there has been much progress yet, but I hope we can get it started up again. Thanks, Roland