From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <Haavard.Skinnemoen@atmel.com>
Received: from bagnes.atmel.com (smtpeu1.atmel.com [195.65.72.27])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7099DDEDA
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 16:07:33 +1000 (EST)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 08:07:00 +0200
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@atmel.com>
To: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue
Message-ID: <20080530080700.773a82cc@siona.local>
In-Reply-To: <1212110003.15633.0.camel@pasglop>
References: <1211852026.3286.36.camel@pasglop>
	<20080526.184047.88207142.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1211854540.3286.42.camel@pasglop>
	<20080526.192812.184590464.davem@davemloft.net>
	<1211859542.3286.46.camel@pasglop>
	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0805270833060.2958@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<1211922621.3286.80.camel@pasglop>
	<alpine.LFD.1.10.0805271421570.2958@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<1211924335.3286.89.camel@pasglop>
	<20080527214241.GA22636@parisc-linux.org>
	<1211926636.3286.100.camel@pasglop>
	<20080528103648.54eb8734@hskinnemo-gx745.norway.atmel.com>
	<1212110003.15633.0.camel@pasglop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tpiepho@freescale.com,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, scottwood@freescale.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

On Fri, 30 May 2008 11:13:23 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> > Currently, this is the only interface I know that can do native-endian
> > accesses, so if you take it away, I'm gonna need an alternative
> > interface that doesn't do byteswapping.  
> 
> Are you aware that these also don't provide any ordering guarantee ?

Yes, but I am not aware of any alternative.

I think the drivers I've written have the necessary barriers (or dma
ops with implicit barriers) that they don't actually depend on any
DMA vs. MMIO ordering guarantees. I hope MMIO vs. MMIO ordering is
guaranteed though?

Haavard