From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk [81.2.110.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7FD6DE917 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 2008 05:59:08 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:43:18 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] [WATCHDOG] mpc83xx_wdt: fix checkpatch issues Message-ID: <20080602204318.4cb77070@core> In-Reply-To: <20080602173836.GA30705@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20080602173726.GA24556@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080602173836.GA30705@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Wim Van Sebroeck , Scott Wood , Andrew Morton , Jochen List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 21:38:36 +0400 Anton Vorontsov wrote: > Quite tired of these warnings ;-), checkpatch spitting them when > seeing the rename patch. I've already sent the maintainer a complete overhaul of watchdog via checkpatch. Alan