From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7A6CDDEED for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:15:46 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:15:30 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8 v4] mpc83xx_wdt rework, support for mpc8610 and mpc8xx Message-Id: <20080603211530.d6b3755a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <18502.5368.786188.835122@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20080602173726.GA24556@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080603164830.32457962.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080604001739.GB24548@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080603173214.0bf71571.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <18502.5368.786188.835122@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, wim@iguana.be, scottwood@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 14:07:20 +1000 Paul Mackerras wrote: > Looking at Linus' git tree, it's evident that some subsystems use the > the "[SUBSYSTEM]" notation and some use "subsystem:". If there is now > an edict from on high that only "subsystem:" is acceptable, then I > must have missed that memo. I'm all edicted out. Sometimes one just puts forth the reasoning and lets others decide whether it's worth bothering about. I could understand that decision being "no" :)