linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Marc Pignat <marc.pignat@hevs.ch>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>,
	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mmc: change .get_ro() callback semantics
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:43:10 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080605144310.GA31596@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806031207.49843.marc.pignat@hevs.ch>

On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:07:49PM +0200, Marc Pignat wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> On Friday 23 May 2008, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > get_ro() callback must return values >= 0 for its logical state, and
> ...
> >  static void pxamci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/host.h b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > index f2e9885..ef3b773 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mmc/host.h
> > @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ struct mmc_host_ops {
> >  	 * Avoid calling these three functions too often or in a "fast path",
> >  	 * since underlaying controller might implement them in an expensive
> >  	 * and/or slow way.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * .get_ro and .get_cd should return >= 0 for their logical values,
> > +	 * or negative errno value in case of error.
> >  	 */
> 
> I would suggest to use something more strict (bulletproof), something like:
> 
> /*
>  * get_ro will return:
>  *   0 for a read/write card
>  *   1 for a read-only card 

This isn't always practical. For example, host is using u8 register for
the status, so it might safely return u8 & mask, that will always fit
into int. Or very smart/adventurous authors might be aware that, for the
particular host, mask's bit isn't last, and safely do uXX & mask. :-)

The above is weak argument of course, since it is about optimization.

As an counter-evidence, the strict scheme that you described probably
less error prone. But is it? To implement it we'll need something like
WARN_ON(ret > 0 && ret != 1) to catch erroneous users. Take a closer
look though, will it catch uXX & lastbit case? Nope. :-)

We can catch bogus users though... via hack (_assuming_ that there
are no errno values of 1 << (sizeof(int) * 8 - 1)), i.e.
WARN_ON(ret == (1 << (sizeof(int) * 8 - 1)). Though, to do so, we don't
need the strict scheme, this debugging hack will work in the current
scheme too.

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-05 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-16 16:50 [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for the card detect line Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-17 11:36 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-05-21 18:47   ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-21 18:47     ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: add support for card-detection polling Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-21 18:47     ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc_spi: " Anton Vorontsov
     [not found]     ` <20080521212831.523f344b@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
2008-05-22 18:17       ` [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for the card detect line Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-22 18:18         ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: add support for card-detection polling Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-22 18:18         ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc_spi: " Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-22 18:18         ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: change .get_ro() callback semantics Anton Vorontsov
     [not found]         ` <20080522213432.4a50629b@mjolnir.drzeus.cx>
2008-05-23 15:42           ` [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for the card detect line Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-23 15:43             ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: add support for card-detection polling Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-23 15:43             ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc_spi: " Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-23 15:43             ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: change .get_ro() callback semantics Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-03 10:07               ` Marc Pignat
2008-06-05 14:43                 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-06-05 15:58                   ` Marc Pignat
2008-06-05 17:10                     ` [PATCH] mmc: toughen get_ro() and get_cd() return values Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-19  3:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for the card detectline Chen Gong
2008-05-22 12:38   ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-22 13:44     ` [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for the carddetectline Chen Gong
2008-05-26 15:37       ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-05-27  2:11         ` [PATCH 3/4] [MMC] mmc_spi: add polling support for thecarddetectline Chen Gong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080605144310.GA31596@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=marc.pignat@hevs.ch \
    --cc=spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=timur@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).