From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com (e4.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e4.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24111DDF91 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 09:49:03 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m55Nn00f014802 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:49:00 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m55Nn0f9193602 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:49:00 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m55NmxZd020519 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2008 19:49:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 18:48:36 -0500 From: Josh Boyer To: Sean MacLennan Subject: Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes Message-ID: <20080605184836.5280e8f4@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20080605173716.3fd28837@wally.pikatech.com> References: <200806041706.21557.sr@denx.de> <20080604220555.658ab13e@vader.jdub.homelinux.org> <20080604231641.786bb2dd@lappy.seanm.ca> <200806050822.00797.sr@denx.de> <20080605173716.3fd28837@wally.pikatech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jean Delvare , Stefan Roese , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:37:16 -0400 Sean MacLennan wrote: > On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 08:22:00 +0200 > "Stefan Roese" wrote: > > > So what should we do now? Currently I2C doesn't work at all on 4xx > > since the driver expects the "index" property and no dts sets this > > property. Personally I would like to move to using cell-index here, > > since this seems to be more common. But I could also life with > > removing the index property and using the "static index" if this is > > preferred and/or acceptable. > > The warp DTS does ;) I can't possibly see how. It lacks the "index" property. josh > > Cheers, > Sean