From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86444DE0F3 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:42:47 +1000 (EST) From: Stefan Roese To: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: "cell-index" vs. "index" vs. no index in I2C device nodes Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:42:38 +0200 References: <48480987.1070701@freescale.com> <20080605225637.GG30980@yookeroo.seuss> <48493713.2070806@freescale.com> In-Reply-To: <48493713.2070806@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200806061542.38908.sr@denx.de> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 06 June 2008, Timur Tabi wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > Aliases aren't trivially reversible, but it shouldn't be too hard to > > write a helper function which will do the scan and parse you describe. > > How about I submit a patch adding a function called > "of_get_aliased_index()"? Would be very welcome. :) Best regards, Stefan