From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pasmtpB.tele.dk (pasmtpb.tele.dk [80.160.77.98]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B8BDEB40 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:57:15 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:57:59 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: John Rigby Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Rev2] MPC5121 FEC support Message-ID: <20080617195759.GC13147@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <1213729717-26688-1-git-send-email-jrigby@freescale.com> <20080617192237.GA12961@uranus.ravnborg.org> <485813EC.6030602@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <485813EC.6030602@freescale.com> Cc: Scott Wood , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jeff@garzik.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:43:40PM -0600, John Rigby wrote: > Thanks Sam, Scott already addressed most of your issues. The > background that you are likely missing and I will add to the patch > header is that the 5121 has an FEC core with all the same registers as > 8xx except the order of the registers is scrambled. Fortunately the old > FEC only exists on CPM1 machines so we can use CONFIG_CPM1 to > differentiate between the two. > > > > > >I we have a conversion from fec_t to struct fec > >then this is a separate patch in the normal case. > > > I'll split the patch into a clean-up patch followed by a 5121 patch. Thanks John. Sam