From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com (e2.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e2.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B6DDDF55 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:41:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e2.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5I0fDhS017824 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:41:13 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m5I0fD5l199350 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:41:13 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m5I0fCEP027333 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:41:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:39:12 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ibm_emac: Remove the ibm_emac driver Message-ID: <20080617203912.4d51ddb9@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1213749283.8129.259.camel@pasglop> References: <20080617193523.028d4cc2@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <20080617201127.6388ff78@lappy.seanm.ca> <1213749283.8129.259.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, Sean MacLennan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:34:43 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 20:11 -0400, Sean MacLennan wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:35:23 -0400 > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > The arch/ppc sub-tree has been removed in the powerpc git tree. The > > > old ibm_emac driver is no longer used by anything as a result of > > > this. This removes it, leaving the ibm_newemac driver as the proper > > > driver to use for PowerPC boards with the EMAC hardware. > > > > Would it make any sense to rename the ibm_newemac driver ibm_emac? > > Yes. One step at a time. And really, that seems like a bunch of busy work for little gain. We'd have to move the files, change the Kconfig options, update all the in-tree defconfigs... just so it can be called ibm_emac? I don't really care either way, but I'll leave it up to the ibm_newemac maintainer to push that change through. If it goes in, I'll update other things as needed. josh