From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Chen Gong <g.chen@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mpc83xx spi prescale modulus calculate
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:28:20 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620122820.GA24187@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1213954697-8569-1-git-send-email-g.chen@freescale.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 05:38:17PM +0800, Chen Gong wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <g.chen@freescale.com>
The patch lacks any description. E.g. at which frequencies the current
math breaks, and why?
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> index 6832da6..070c621 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi_mpc83xx.c
> @@ -266,21 +266,24 @@ int mpc83xx_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, struct spi_transfer *t)
>
> cs->hw_mode |= SPMODE_LEN(bits_per_word);
>
> - if ((mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / hz) >= 64) {
> - pm = mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / (hz * 64) - 1;
> - if (pm > 0x0f) {
> - dev_err(&spi->dev, "Requested speed is too "
> - "low: %d Hz. Will use %d Hz instead.\n",
> - hz, mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / 1024);
> - pm = 0x0f;
> + if ((mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / hz) > 64) {
> + pm = mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / (hz * 64);
> + if (pm > 16) {
Suppose this didn't happen. So we calculated:
pm = mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / (hz * 64);
And we didn't set any hw flag.
> + cs->hw_mode |= SPMODE_DIV16;
> + pm /= 16;
> + if (pm > 16) {
> + dev_err(&spi->dev, "Requested speed is too "
> + "low: %d Hz. Will use %d Hz instead.\n",
> + hz, mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / 1024);
> + pm = 16;
> + }
> }
> - cs->hw_mode |= SPMODE_PM(pm) | SPMODE_DIV16;
> - } else {
> + } else
> pm = mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / (hz * 4);
Now suppose this did happen. So we calculated:
pm = mpc83xx_spi->spibrg / (hz * 4);
And we didn't set any hw flag either.
So, we used two different formulas with the same hw flags.
Maybe I'm missing something, but this looks quite wrong.
> - if (pm)
> - pm--;
> - cs->hw_mode |= SPMODE_PM(pm);
> - }
> + if (pm)
> + pm--;
> +
> + cs->hw_mode |= SPMODE_PM(pm);
> regval = mpc83xx_spi_read_reg(&mpc83xx_spi->base->mode);
> if (cs->hw_mode != regval) {
> unsigned long flags;
> --
> 1.5.4
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-20 9:38 [PATCH] fix mpc83xx spi prescale modulus calculate Chen Gong
2008-06-20 9:47 ` Li Yang
2008-06-20 12:28 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-06-20 13:12 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080620122820.GA24187@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=g.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox