linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	vbordug@ru.mvista.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:21:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200806261321.24338.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806181716.40362.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2642 bytes --]

Jeff, Scott,

On Wednesday 18 June 2008 17:16, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 June 2008 17:00, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > Hi Scott,
> > > 
> > > On Monday 16 June 2008 18:34, Scott Wood wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:57:02AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >>> On Monday 26 May 2008 11:53, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > >>>> Port the fs_enet driver to support the MDIO on GPIO driver for PHY
> > >>>> access in addition to the mii-bitbang driver.
> > >>> Now that 1/2 has been applied by Jeff, could this one make it to 
> > >>> powerpc-next ?
> > >> This patch should probably go through Jeff as well...
> > > 
> > > Jeff, what's your opinion on this ?
> > > 
> > >> Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> > >>
> > >>>> -	data = of_get_property(phynode, "reg", &len);
> > >>>> -	if (!data || len != 4)
> > >>>> -		goto out_put_mdio;
> > >>>> +	bus_id = of_get_gpio(mdionode, 0);
> > >>>> +	if (bus_id < 0) {
> > >>>> +		struct resource res;
> > >>>> +		ret = of_address_to_resource(mdionode, 0, &res);
> > >>>> +		if (ret)
> > >>>> +			goto out_put_mdio;
> > >>>> +		bus_id = res.start;
> > >>>> +	}
> > >>>>  
> > >>>> -	snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, "%x:%02x", res.start, *data);
> > >>>> +	snprintf(fpi->bus_id, 16, "%x:%02x", bus_id, *data);
> > 
> > What are the patch dependencies, if any?
> > 
> > My general rule is, anytime I see 80%+ of the patch dealing with 
> > arch-specific API functions (such as OF resource stuff), I tend to 
> > prefer that goes via an arch tree.
> > 
> > If it's a networking change, of course I'd prefer it came in my direction.
> 
> The patch modifies the way the Freescale SoC fs_enet driver computes the PHY 
> bus_id field when it connects to a PHY.
> 
> The 'legacy' binding method was to use the MDIO general purpose I/O register 
> address to identify the mii bus. My first patch (OpenFirmware GPIO based MDIO 
> bitbang driver) introduces a new binding using the GPIO library.
> 
> With this patch the mii bus is now identified by the GPIO lib I/O resource 
> number if available and falls back to the register address when the device 
> tree uses the legacy binding.
> 
> There should be no dependencies. When the OF GPIO support is not selected 
> linux/of_gpio.h will define of_get_gpio() as a stub, so the fs_enet driver 
> will fall back to the legacy binding.

Have we reached a consensus on which tree the patch should go to ?

-- 
Laurent Pinchart
CSE Semaphore Belgium

Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
B-1410 Waterloo
Belgium

T +32 (2) 387 42 59
F +32 (2) 387 42 75

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-26 11:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-26  9:52 [PATCH 0/2] MDIO on GPIO support for the fs_enet driver Laurent Pinchart
2008-05-26  9:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] net: OpenFirmware GPIO based MDIO bitbang driver Laurent Pinchart
2008-05-31  2:20   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-05-26  9:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-16  8:57   ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-16 16:34     ` Scott Wood
2008-06-18 14:48       ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-18 15:00         ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-18 15:16           ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-26 11:21             ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2008-06-26 13:55               ` Vitaly Bordug
2008-07-18  9:26                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-07-18 13:40                   ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-18 17:10                     ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200806261321.24338.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
    --to=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=vbordug@ru.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).