From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yow.seanm.ca (toronto-hs-216-138-233-67.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.233.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D8A3DE2F6 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:27:35 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:27:32 -0400 From: Sean MacLennan To: "Timur Tabi" Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: add of_find_next_property andof_get_aliased_index Message-ID: <20080626142732.0ff6e64c@lappy.seanm.ca> In-Reply-To: <4863BBE2.2060107@freescale.com> References: <1214424332-18496-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <4863B1C1.1060300@freescale.com> <200806261751.05379.sr@denx.de> <4863BBE2.2060107@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:55:14 -0500 "Timur Tabi" wrote: > Well, there's a lot of disagreement on this subject. Not only do we > not agree on a method of enumerating devices, a lot of people have a > problem with the concept of enumerating them in the first place! An interesting point is that I enforced an index in the i2c-ibm_iic driver with no disagreement at all ;) Cheers, Sean