From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC5DDDD04 for ; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 01:35:53 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:35:13 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Kumar Gala , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc: Add dma nodes to 83xx, 85xx and 86xx boards Message-ID: <20080630153513.GD13950@loki.buserror.net> References: <48654D6D.1090309@freescale.com> <20080630041525.GD24012@yookeroo.seuss> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080630041525.GD24012@yookeroo.seuss> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:15:25PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 04:10:17PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > Added DMA nodes for the elo/elo-plus DMA engines. > > > > Renamed the interrupt controller alias in mpc832x_rdb.dts to ipic so that > > its the same as all the other boards. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > > [snip] > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/asp834x-redboot.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/asp834x-redboot.dts > > index 972cf78..8b1bb0e 100644 > > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/asp834x-redboot.dts > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/asp834x-redboot.dts > > @@ -118,6 +118,41 @@ > > mode = "cpu"; > > }; > > > > + dma@82a8 { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <1>; > > + compatible = "fsl,mpc8347-dma", "fsl,elo-dma"; > > + reg = <0x82a8 4>; > > + ranges = <0 0x8100 0x1a8>; > > + interrupt-parent = <&ipic>; > > + interrupts = <71 8>; > > + cell-index = <0>; > > What's the cell-index in these nodes used to index? Given the > confusion there's been about the proper use of this property, a > comment indicating which shared registers this is used to index is > probably a good idea. There's supposed to be a cell-index in the *channels* to index into the shared summary register (the "reg" of the dma node itself). I don't see any purpose for a cell-index in the main dma node, though. -Scott