From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay005.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.171]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FD2DE28C for ; Wed, 2 Jul 2008 18:41:42 +1000 (EST) From: Laurent Pinchart To: Kumar Gala , Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Commits added to powerpc.git master and powerpc-next branches Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 10:41:39 +0200 References: <18537.30774.608486.268257@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <200807011049.32699.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <58163CFC-A697-4FF7-ADC5-A1B9C976965E@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <58163CFC-A697-4FF7-ADC5-A1B9C976965E@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1350922.jEyJ1dvVkC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200807021041.40306.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --nextPart1350922.jEyJ1dvVkC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 02 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote: >=20 > On Jul 1, 2008, at 3:49 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >=20 > > Hi Paul, > > > > On Tuesday 01 July 2008, Paul Mackerras wrote: > >> The following commits have been added to the master and powerpc-next > >> branches of the powerpc.git repository. This includes patches pulled > >> from Kumar's and Josh's trees. > > > > Any change of getting the following patches into 2.6.27 ? They have =20 > > either been acked and not picked, or just ignored so far :-/ > > > > [PATCHv2] fs_enet: restore promiscuous and multicast settings in =20 > > restart() > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=3D968&id=3D19228 >=20 > Should go via netdev unless jgarizk says otherwise On 2008-06-18, Jeff wrote: "My general rule is, anytime I see 80%+ of the patch dealing with=20 arch-specific API functions (such as OF resource stuff), I tend to=20 prefer that goes via an arch tree. If it's a networking change, of course I'd prefer it came in my direction." Jeff, could you please tell us if you want to pick this one or if it should= go through the powerpc tree ? The patch has been posted to both the linuxp= pc-dev and netdev lists, and I haven't received any comment from the netdev= folks. > > [PATCH 2/2] fs_enet: MDIO on GPIO support > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=3D968&id=3D18693 >=20 > ditto Jeff, same question :-) > > [PATCHv3 1/2] [POWERPC] CPM2: Implement GPIO LIB API on CPM2 =20 > > Freescale SoC. > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=3D968&id=3D19045 >=20 > I'll look at this one Thanks. > > [PATCH] powerpc: Modem control lines support for the cpm_uart driver > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=3D968&id=3D17928 >=20 > this seems to depend on the previous patch. It doesn't strictly depend on the previous one. You will need GPIO LIB API = on CPM2 to use the modem control lines, but the cpm_uart driver will fall b= ack to the current behaviour if no GPIO LIB support is present. > > [PATCH] cpm_uart: Support uart_wait_until_sent() > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?person=3D968&id=3D19233 >=20 >=20 > applied =2D-=20 Laurent Pinchart CSE Semaphore Belgium Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A B-1410 Waterloo Belgium T +32 (2) 387 42 59 =46 +32 (2) 387 42 75 --nextPart1350922.jEyJ1dvVkC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkhrP0QACgkQ8y9gWxC9vpdRagCeJzkxXqJNnUwI67mLtxBKtH/d CqgAniFhg8o7UTxeGCjE2mG6Z7cUoPnA =BlMw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1350922.jEyJ1dvVkC--