From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from services.gcu-squad.org (zone0.gcu-squad.org [212.85.147.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568D6DDE11 for ; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 17:36:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 09:35:16 +0200 From: Jean Delvare To: "Grant Likely" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20080704093516.6d9a8195@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: References: <20080703133905.7b6f058f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080703054739.GA643@secretlab.ca> <9e4733910807030522h1aa0bl1801ecc5fc877c25@mail.gmail.com> <20080703152453.GB2284@secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Timur Tabi List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 23:54:26 -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 08:22:18AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote: > >> Testing was good when the patch was initially posted in January. In > >> the last six months the initial patch set has been sliced and diced > >> into a bunch of different pieces but the contents of this patch are > >> essentially unchanged. > >> > >> I don't care which tree it uses to get to mainline, I'd just like to > >> see it get merged. > > > > Me too, but it is used by some of the mpc8xxx platforms too, so I'd like > > to see an ack from one of those users also. > > Okay, I've tested it on my board. All looks good to me. I'd prefer > to hear back from one of the Freescale folks, but on a second reading > I think it is pretty safe. I'll make sure any merge conflicts are > resolved. > > Jean, is it okay with you to drop it from your tree and merge it through mine? Sure, no problem. It's done now, the patch is yours. -- Jean Delvare