From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC10FDDE09 for ; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:38:11 +1000 (EST) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so750948yxg.39 for ; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:38:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:38:07 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: Updates to powerpc.git Message-ID: <20080709143807.GD26524@secretlab.ca> References: <1215588881.8970.358.camel@pasglop> <20080709091846.69b08e34@zod.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev list , Andrew Morton List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:40:21AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jul 9, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:34:41 +1000 >> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> Also, Paul is pretty good about not rebasing his branches when at all >> possible, and I suspect that's why his master and next were often the >> same. It makes life lots easier for the sub-maintainers and anyone >> trying to track against the tree. I humbly beg you to keep that >> going. > > I agree and I'm sure linus will tell you how evil it is to rebase as a > maintainer. Add my voice to the chorus. Rebasing a branch that I commit on top of really messes up the workflow. g.