From: Chandru <chandru@in.ibm.com>
To: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@austin.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] kdump : add support for ibm, dynamic-reconfiguration-memory for kexec/kdump
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:39:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807111639.22032.chandru@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48768CE9.2080802@austin.ibm.com>
On Friday 11 July 2008 03:57:53 Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Hello Chandru,
>
> > static int __init early_init_dt_scan_drconf_memory(unsigned long node)
> > {
> > - cell_t *dm, *ls;
> > + cell_t *dm, *ls, *endp, *usm;
> > unsigned long l, n, flags;
> > u64 base, size, lmb_size;
> > + char buf[32], t[8];
> >
> > ls = (cell_t *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "ibm,lmb-size", &l);
> > if (ls == NULL || l < dt_root_size_cells * sizeof(cell_t))
> > @@ -917,7 +918,33 @@ static int __init early_init_dt_scan_drc
> > if ((base + size) > 0x80000000ul)
> > size = 0x80000000ul - base;
> > }
> > - lmb_add(base, size);
> > + strcpy(buf, "linux,usable-memory");
> > + sprintf(t, "%d", (int)n);
> > + strcat(buf, t);
> > + usm = (cell_t *)of_get_flat_dt_prop(node,
> > + (const char *)buf, &l);
> > + if (usm != NULL) {
> > + endp = usm + (l / sizeof(cell_t));
> > + while ((endp - usm) >= (dt_root_addr_cells +
> > + dt_root_size_cells)) {
> > + base = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_addr_cells,
> > + &usm);
> > + size = dt_mem_next_cell(dt_root_size_cells,
> > + &usm);
> > + if (size == 0)
> > + continue;
> > + if (iommu_is_off) {
> > + if ((base + size) > 0x80000000ul)
> > + size = 0x80000000ul - base;
> > + }
> > + lmb_add(base, size);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Continue with next lmb entry */
> > + continue;
> > + } else {
> > + lmb_add(base, size);
> > + }
> > }
>
> I am still digging through the kexec tools but I don't think you want
> the processing of the linux,usable-memory property inside of the
> for (; n!= 0; --n) loop. This should be moved up so that it looks for
> the linux,usable-memory property and parses it, then if it is not found
> look for the ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory property and parse it.
>
> There is no need to look for the linux-usable-memory property every time
> a piece of the ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory property is parsed.
>
> -Nathan
Hello Nathan,
Thanks for the review. kexec-tools adds a 'linux,usable-memory' property for
each memory range listed in the device tree. If the regions are not
crashkernel or rtas or tce regions, then it sets base and size to zero but
still adds them as linux,usable-memory property. If we look at the code
above, in a kdump kernel we don't add an lmb through lmb_add() if the regions
are not one of the mentioned above. We check for (size == 0) and continue
with next lmb if it is so. We still have the complete device tree which
kexec-tools passes in as the buffer that we are scanning here and
linux,usable-memory properties aid in making kdump kernel to see only those
memory regions that it is suppose to use. I just worked on another version
of this patch based on comments from Michael Neuling and Stephen Rothwell. I
will post it shortly.
Thanks,
Chandru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-11 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-07 18:44 [PATCH 1/4] kdump : add support for ibm, dynamic-reconfiguration-memory for kexec/kdump Chandru
2008-07-08 1:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-08 10:58 ` Chandru
2008-07-08 1:56 ` Michael Neuling
2008-07-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] kdump : add support for ibm, dynamic-reconfiguration-memory for kexec/kdump Nathan Fontenot
2008-07-11 11:09 ` Chandru [this message]
2008-07-11 13:49 ` [PATCH 1/4][V2] powerpc : add support for linux, usable-memory properties for drconf memory Chandru
2008-07-22 9:01 ` Chandru
2008-07-22 9:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-22 9:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-07-25 16:51 ` Chandru
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807111639.22032.chandru@in.ibm.com \
--to=chandru@in.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=nfont@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).