From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] I2C: fsl-i2c: make device probing configurable via FDT
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 08:24:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080716142436.GD24045@secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487DD1BD.8040701@grandegger.com>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:47:25PM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Currently, the I2C buses are probed for HWMON I2C devices, which might
> not be acceptable in same cases. This patch makes device probing
> configurable through the property "probe" of the FDT I2C device node:
>
> i2c@3000 {
> ...
> compatible = "fsl-i2c";
> probe;
> ...
> };
You need to add documentation to booting-without-of.txt about what the
'probe' property means. Also, 'probe' is a pretty generic term being
used in an i2c specific context. Can you prefix it with i2c or
something to protect the namespace? 'i2c-probe' perhaps?
> Assuming that systems using fsl-i2c should have proper platform data,
> probing is disabled by default. Unfortunately, that's not the case and
> various DTS files would require to be updated.
This comment doesn't seem to be correct.
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> include/linux/fsl_devices.h | 1 +
This will need to be reworked for current top of tree. i2c-mpc
dependence on fsl_soc.c has been removed.
Thanks,
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-16 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-16 10:47 [RFC] I2C: fsl-i2c: make device probing configurable via FDT Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 12:05 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-16 13:03 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 12:47 ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 13:09 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 14:11 ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 14:24 ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 14:30 ` Grant Likely
2008-07-16 14:42 ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 15:01 ` Timur Tabi
2008-07-16 14:24 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2008-07-16 14:48 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-07-16 20:20 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-17 10:20 ` Is there relationship between address translation enabled and PLB timeout error? Evangelion
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080716142436.GD24045@secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).