From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3AADE644 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 01:04:31 +1000 (EST) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so620355qwb.15 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2008 08:04:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:04:22 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Anton Vorontsov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] leds: implement OpenFirmare GPIO LED driver Message-ID: <20080717150422.GC31932@secretlab.ca> References: <1216133032.5345.73.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <20080715151917.GA30607@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080717041531.GA27243@secretlab.ca> <20080717140519.GA32617@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> <20080717141335.GA2219@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20080717141335.GA2219@polina.dev.rtsoft.ru> Sender: Grant Likely Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Richard Purdie , Trent Piepho List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:13:35PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 06:05:19PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > [...] > > > I think it would be better to have a module that scans the device tree > > > for LED nodes and registers a single leds-gpio platform device for the > > > whole lot. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > I like the idea, thanks. > > Ugh, no. The idea sounds good, but in practice it isn't, since we'll > have to handle suspend/resume ops ourselves. When we stick with the > device/driver model we're getting all this for free. Won't the leds-gpio driver give you suspend/resume support? g.