From: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] [POWERPC] CPM2: Implement GPIO LIB API on CPM2 Freescale SoC.
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:07:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807181707.56921.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97D0950D-BBCA-4859-936E-774D887B05DC@kernel.crashing.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1152 bytes --]
On Friday 18 July 2008, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Jul 18, 2008, at 9:38 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>
> > On Friday 27 June 2008, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> >> Hi Laurent,
> >>
> >>> Is there any pending issue or can this be applied to powerpc-next ?
> >>
> >> Looks OK to me.
> >>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>
> >>>> Cc: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
> >> Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
> >
> > Any news on this patch ? Kumar, could you apply it to your tree for
> > 2.6.27 ?
>
> Can you repost it. I not sure what patch 2/2 was and if I've already
> dealt with it.
2/2 was "[PATCH2/2] [POWERPC] CPM1: implement GPIO LIB API on CPM1 Freescale SoC." posted by Jochen Friedrich. You haven't dealt with it yet as far as I know, but it would be up to Jochen to resubmit.
The "PATCHv3 1/2" patch can be considered as-is, as it doesn't depend on 2/2. Should I resubmit a "PATCHv4" that just changes the subject line ?
--
Laurent Pinchart
CSE Semaphore Belgium
Chaussee de Bruxelles, 732A
B-1410 Waterloo
Belgium
T +32 (2) 387 42 59
F +32 (2) 387 42 75
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-18 17:16 [PATCHv2 1/2] [POWERPC] CPM2: Implement GPIO LIB API on CPM2 Freescale SoC Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-13 12:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-13 14:57 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-06-13 15:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-18 16:56 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-06-18 17:08 ` [PATCHv3 " Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-26 11:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-06-27 16:50 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-07-18 14:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-07-18 14:50 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-18 15:07 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2008-07-18 15:28 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-18 15:28 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-18 15:30 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-07-18 15:46 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-18 15:52 ` Jochen Friedrich
2008-07-24 14:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-07-24 15:12 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-24 16:00 ` [PATCHv4] cpm2: " Laurent Pinchart
2008-07-25 17:42 ` Kumar Gala
2008-07-28 8:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-07-28 12:42 ` Kumar Gala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200807181707.56921.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--to=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).