* 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported?
@ 2008-07-18 18:43 Marvin
2008-07-18 21:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-18 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marvin @ 2008-07-18 18:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
Hi,
while trying to cleanup some configs/makefiles for ppc64 I noticed, that
CONFIG_POWER4 implies CONFIG_PPC64 and vice versa in all defconfigs.
So I want to boldly replace CONFIG_POWER4 by CONFIG_PPC64 - ugh.
However, there are some constructs like:
#ifndef CONFIG_PPC64
...
#ifdef CONFIG_POWER4
...
#endif
...
#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
in which POWER4 is always undefined, e.g. in
include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h. Maybe this is a leftover from times, where
64-bit kernels where not supported on Powermacs. Is this 32-bit support still
necessary?
Greetings
Marvin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported?
2008-07-18 18:43 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported? Marvin
@ 2008-07-18 21:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-18 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2008-07-18 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
On Friday 18 July 2008, Marvin wrote:
> in which POWER4 is always undefined, e.g. in
> include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h. Maybe this is a leftover from times, where
> 64-bit kernels where not supported on Powermacs. Is this 32-bit support still
> necessary?
There is currently no 64-bit machine that is supported by current kernels,
and I don't think there is any reason to add this again.
I'm not sure what the point of your plan to replace CONFIG_POWER4 is, but
it sounds like this case is slightly different, as you remove a potential
feature, so I guess it should be a separate patch.
Arnd <><
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported?
2008-07-18 18:43 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported? Marvin
2008-07-18 21:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2008-07-18 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-19 7:29 ` Marvin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2008-07-18 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marvin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 20:43 +0200, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while trying to cleanup some configs/makefiles for ppc64 I noticed, that
> CONFIG_POWER4 implies CONFIG_PPC64 and vice versa in all defconfigs.
> So I want to boldly replace CONFIG_POWER4 by CONFIG_PPC64 - ugh.
No, those are different.
CONFIG_PPC64 means a 64 bits kernel.
CONFIG_POWER4 means a 64 bits kernel that only runs on IBM POWER4 and
later (ie, processors conforming to, iirc, version 2.01 or later of
the architecture).
That is, it's legal to have CONFIG_PPC64 and !CONFIG_POWER4, and this
is even necessary if you want to boot on a POWER3 or an RS64 processor.
Now, there also used to be some 32 bits support for POWER4 and G5 but
that has been dropped a while ago.
Cheers,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported?
2008-07-18 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
@ 2008-07-19 7:29 ` Marvin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marvin @ 2008-07-19 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Arnd Bergmann
Hi,
On Saturday 19 July 2008 00:14:35 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 20:43 +0200, Marvin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while trying to cleanup some configs/makefiles for ppc64 I noticed, that
> > CONFIG_POWER4 implies CONFIG_PPC64 and vice versa in all defconfigs.
> > So I want to boldly replace CONFIG_POWER4 by CONFIG_PPC64 - ugh.
>
> No, those are different.
>
> CONFIG_PPC64 means a 64 bits kernel.
>
> CONFIG_POWER4 means a 64 bits kernel that only runs on IBM POWER4 and
> later (ie, processors conforming to, iirc, version 2.01 or later of
> the architecture).
>
> That is, it's legal to have CONFIG_PPC64 and !CONFIG_POWER4, and this
> is even necessary if you want to boot on a POWER3 or an RS64 processor.
I don't want to replace CONFIG_POWER4 by void, but by something like
CONFIG_TUNE_POWER4 (see my previous post, one week ago). So there is
no "feature loss". CONFIG_POWER3 is used only to define HAVE_BATS, so I
thought I can clean this up.
> Now, there also used to be some 32 bits support for POWER4 and G5 but
> that has been dropped a while ago.
Ok - that's fine.
I hope to finish my patches during the weekend, so things will become more
clear.
Greetings
Marvin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-19 7:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-18 18:43 32-bit kernel on PPC64 supported? Marvin
2008-07-18 21:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2008-07-18 22:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-19 7:29 ` Marvin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).