From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk [81.2.110.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9454EDDE24 for ; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 21:02:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 11:44:36 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: fix struct uart_info change fallout Message-ID: <20080722114436.2c13edea@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20080722130152.f115224d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20080722102520.ca801ab5.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080722025850.0d073a5e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20080722130152.f115224d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ppc-dev , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , LKML List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > What is your problem with the linux-next tree. The problem was > discovered and reported when I first merged the ttydev tree into > linux-next on July 1. The fixes were in linux-next on July 2. Yes .. and ? The clashes kept happening despite that when I was doing the merges (and going on holiday for a week and trying to sort it out with limited time and internet access) Sorry I don't follow your line of discussion at all here ? > > just going to break the tree again and mean I have to run another set of > > tests and regressions. > > Please give what until tomorrow? it - the situation. The patches have all gone to Linus. Alan