From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e1.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44E12DDF93 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:13:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6PNDRbP028073 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:13:27 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m6PNCBWa189140 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:12:11 -0400 Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m6PNCA3J030464 for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:12:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 19:08:38 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support Message-ID: <20080725190838.27c227bc@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1217021937.11188.110.camel@pasglop> References: <1211391577.6232.15.camel@gargoyle> <18484.60888.981390.893747@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <1213992894.6635.41.camel@gargoyle> <20080719093752.5aada45c@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216658194.5727.36.camel@gargoyle> <20080721130551.23a06006@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216777678.5727.82.camel@gargoyle> <20080723115321.53aa655b@zod.rchland.ibm.com> <1216829442.5727.97.camel@gargoyle> <1216958433.11188.70.camel@pasglop> <83A1F423-1C8B-405D-9118-D9BB51A8AA94@kernel.crashing.org> <1217021937.11188.110.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: ppc-dev , Hellwig , Paul Mackerras , Christoph List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 07:38:57 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Josh pointed out that you went ahead and merged this. Curse you :) > > > > I've got a patch in my tree to address my initial concerns. > > Well, I asked Josh on IRC and he was fine, I got your email too late. I was (and still am) OK with it. Kumar's comments are valid but not major for 44x. Some cleanup could be done, but I was more focused on getting it in during this merge window. I think we just had a small case of bad timing. I blame conferences and late nights of beer^H^H^H^Hcoding. josh