linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER [was [PATCH] x86: BUILD_IRQ say .text]
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:41:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080728144133.GH18144@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807251839190.20617@blonde.site>


* Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote:

> [PATCH] sched: move sched_clock before first use
> 
> Move sched_clock() up to stop warning: weak declaration of 
> `sched_clock' after first use results in unspecified behavior (if 
> -fno-unit-at-a-time).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>

applied to tip/sched/urgent - thanks Hugh.

> I rather think CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER shouldn't exist at all (or be a 
> private, config-user-invisible, specific-to-a-few-arches thing): what 
> one wants to configure is how far to sacrifice cpu performance and 
> kernel smallness to getting a good stacktrace.  Frame pointer is just 
> an implementation detail on that, appropriate to some arches. Perhaps 
> three settings: no stacktrace, fair stacktrace, best stacktrace.

actually, we consciously use and rely on frame pointers on x86. The 
runtime cost on 64-bit is miniscule and the improved backtrace output in 
recent kernels makes backtraces _much_ easier to interpret:

 Call Trace:
  <NMI>  [<ffffffff80480779>] _raw_spin_trylock+0x19/0x50
  [<ffffffff808fb2e9>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x59/0x90
  [<ffffffff80261ab4>] atomic_notifier_chain_register+0x24/0x60
  [<ffffffff80262f38>] ? __profile_tick+0x58/0x90
  [<ffffffff808fd1a9>] nmi_watchdog_tick+0x59/0x1e0
  [<ffffffff808fc79a>] default_do_nmi+0x6a/0x220
  [<ffffffff808fc9b4>] do_nmi+0x64/0xb0
  [<ffffffff808fc032>] nmi+0xa2/0xc2
  [<ffffffff80285bd1>] ? stopmachine+0x61/0xd0
  <<EOE>>  [<ffffffff8020dca9>] child_rip+0xa/0x11
  [<ffffffff8020cf3e>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
  [<ffffffff80285b70>] ? stopmachine+0x0/0xd0
  [<ffffffff8020dc9f>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x11

we experimented with using dwarf2 data in the past but it proved to be 
very fragile in practice - we depended too much on the whims of 
gcc/binutils being absolutely correct, etc.

Something as fundamental to the kernel's general health as backtraces 
must not be fragile. So the EBP based backtracing code was ported to 
64-bit as well and it was improved further upon.

kudos to Arjan for that.

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-28 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807211828470.26173@blonde.site>
     [not found] ` <20080724104459.GI28817@elte.hu>
2008-07-25 18:45   ` CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER [was [PATCH] x86: BUILD_IRQ say .text] Hugh Dickins
2008-07-25 21:46     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-26 11:02       ` Hugh Dickins
2008-07-26 12:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-07-28 13:52           ` Gabriel Paubert
2008-07-28 14:41     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-07-28 14:54       ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080728144133.GH18144@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).