linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-next: pci-current tree build failure
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 19:15:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200807281915.24018.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080729105213.0ac2acbd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Monday, July 28, 2008 5:52 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jesse,
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> arch/powerpc/kernel/iommu.c:54: error: static declaration of
> 'iommu_num_pages' follows non-static declaration
> include/linux/iommu-helper.h:11: error: previous declaration of
> 'iommu_num_pages' was here
>
> Caused by commit 3bc9f79ee1ddc913be0a6d3592036683ef8a3148 ("iommu: add
> iommu_num_pages helper function") which introduced a global version of a
> function that powerpc has a different version of.  I am not sure that the
> two do the same thing - in fact they don't since powerpc can have a 64k
> page size and still need to use a 4k iommu pages.  I applied the
> patch below (which I personally hate :-))

Hopefully my ppc machine will arrive soon and I can build & test boot things 
so this won't happen in the future.

Joerg, what do you think here?

Thanks,
Jesse

      reply	other threads:[~2008-07-29  2:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-29  0:52 linux-next: pci-current tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2008-07-29  2:15 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200807281915.24018.jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).