From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from az33egw02.freescale.net (az33egw02.freescale.net [192.88.158.103]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "az33egw02.freescale.net", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B71DE21E for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 05:39:24 +1000 (EST) Received: from az33smr02.freescale.net (az33smr02.freescale.net [10.64.34.200]) by az33egw02.freescale.net (8.12.11/az33egw02) with ESMTP id m6TJd3D8007458 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:39:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net (ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net [10.82.19.112]) by az33smr02.freescale.net (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id m6TJd2VI010233 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:39:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:39:01 -0500 From: Scott Wood To: Matvejchikov Ilya Subject: Re: No output from SMC1 console with the 2.6.26 kernel (8xx based board) Message-ID: <20080729193901.GC8051@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <8496f91a0807281243y2193dad5hc758444fe0a10258@mail.gmail.com> <488E2510.7070209@freescale.com> <8496f91a0807282310r5e70fe01v85b2ff2da7a80416@mail.gmail.com> <488F385B.9030504@nanometrics.ca> <8496f91a0807291136v172b3b16t170088faf3f30b5b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <8496f91a0807291136v172b3b16t170088faf3f30b5b@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Ben Gardiner , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:36:30PM +0400, Matvejchikov Ilya wrote: > Have you tired to run 2.6.25 kernel? With 2.6.25.4 my console works > fine! I suspect there is something like a regression.... Did you use CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING in 2.6.25? It became mandatory in 2.6.26. Also, try commenting out cpm_setbrg() calls in case the frequency is not being set properly. 2.6.26 introduced the allocation of the CPM2 SMC parameter RAM area; what did your device node look like in 2.6.25? What happens if you use that device tree with 2.6.26? -Scott