From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.189]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DC0DDE21 for ; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:20:46 +1000 (EST) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id e30so320954fke.9 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:20:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: ide pmac breakage Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 05:17:27 +0200 References: <1217208596.11188.144.camel@pasglop> <200807310248.29214.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1217466559.11188.378.camel@pasglop> In-Reply-To: <1217466559.11188.378.camel@pasglop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200807310517.27978.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, petkovbb@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 31 July 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 02:48 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > There seems to be some confusion between warm-plugging of IDE devices > > and hot-plugging of IDE devices. > > > > > not a single piece of HW to exercise those code path ? I don't ask you > > > to get a powermac with a media-bay, but ide_cs seems to be a pretty > > > important one that's part of what the ide maintainer should take care > > > of... And I suspect it's going to exercise the same code path as > > > mediabay. > > > > I'm open for offers of co-maintaince of the code (which includes taking > > over particular host drivers) and since you seem to have pretty good > > insight into what ide maintainer should be doing I presume that you want > > to be added to MAINTAINERS? > > Should I laugh ? > > Seriously here. Those things used to work, you broke them. That's jumping to conlusions as you haven't yet proven that it was really me. :) Which would be great because than I can finally start fixing the damage. > It may be worthwile cleanup / improvements, but at the end of the day, > if you are the maintainer for drivers/ide, and things as fundamental as > supporting proper ide_cs seems to be totally part of your job. I'm not Maybe I'm really completely unsuited for the job. I even didn't know that proper supporting of _one_ particular host driver is a _fundamental_ part of the _subsystem_ maintainer's job... > saying ide_cs is broken today (though I suspect it -may- be suffering > from similar breakage to media-bay), however, I'm reacting to your > apparent lack of interest in making sure these things work. If only all people showed so much interest as *IDE*PMAC* Maintainer in making sure that things work (instead of i.e. telling people what should they be doing in their _limited_ _private_ time) we would have nothing to worry about! ;) Can we now go back to fixing ide-pmac breakage? Pretty please. It is not unlikely that it in the time it took for the last four mails it would have been fixed already.