From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Board level compatibility matching
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 10:01:07 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080801.100107.-1666252871.imp@bsdimp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080801111141.3543e23b@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
I'd float a radical definition of 'compatible' here.
If the generic code can handle it with just changes to the device
tree, then it is compatible. And by generic code, I wouldn't suggest
a twisty maze of ifdefs or special case hacks. I'm talking truly
generic code that is table driven entirely from the dtc. If you need
special C code to initialize the board, then it isn't compatible.
This is exactly analogous to the pc-net driver supporting dozens of
different cards that differ only in their ID. Are all these cards
100% the same: no. There's plenty of differences between them.
However, the pc-net driver copes with the small differences so that
one driver can handle most of the ne2000 class of network cards.
Are there special drivers for ne2000-like cards that aren't quite
compatible enough or have extra features, sure.
That doesn't totally invalidate the utility. There are always
engineering trade offs to be made.
Warner
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 20:19 Board level compatibility matching Grant Likely
2008-07-31 20:39 ` Chris Friesen
2008-07-31 20:49 ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-31 20:52 ` Grant Likely
2008-07-31 20:58 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-01 2:47 ` David Gibson
2008-08-01 3:06 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-01 3:30 ` David Gibson
2008-08-01 4:00 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-01 4:25 ` David Gibson
2008-08-01 4:37 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-01 6:22 ` David Gibson
2008-07-31 20:59 ` Scott Wood
2008-07-31 21:09 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-01 2:54 ` David Gibson
2008-08-01 3:25 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-01 3:38 ` David Gibson
2008-08-01 4:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-01 12:06 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-01 12:28 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-01 14:30 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-01 22:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-02 0:07 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-01 14:27 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-01 15:11 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-01 16:01 ` M. Warner Losh [this message]
2008-08-01 16:24 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-01 22:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080801.100107.-1666252871.imp@bsdimp.com \
--to=imp@bsdimp.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).