platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Adrian Bunk]

arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp-nand.c was added this year and updated 
quite recently.

warp-nand.c is empty unless CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NDFC=y.

MTD_NAND_NDFC depends on !PPC_MERGE.

!PPC_MERGE can never be true on PPC now that arch/ppc/ got removed.

So warp-nand.c is dead code, but that does not seem to be intentionally?

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

Re: platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Josh Boyer]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:14:01 +0300
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp-nand.c was added this year and updated 
> quite recently.
> 
> warp-nand.c is empty unless CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NDFC=y.
> 
> MTD_NAND_NDFC depends on !PPC_MERGE.
> 
> !PPC_MERGE can never be true on PPC now that arch/ppc/ got removed.
> 
> So warp-nand.c is dead code, but that does not seem to be intentionally?

I don't believe it is intentional, no.  Sean can you look at this and
see what's up?  I have a couple of fixes to queue up from you already
and if you can get this one done in the next few days I'll included it
as well.

josh

Re: platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Valentine Barshak]

Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:14:01 +0300
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp-nand.c was added this year and updated 
>> quite recently.
>>
>> warp-nand.c is empty unless CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NDFC=y.
>>
>> MTD_NAND_NDFC depends on !PPC_MERGE.
>>
>> !PPC_MERGE can never be true on PPC now that arch/ppc/ got removed.
>>
>> So warp-nand.c is dead code, but that does not seem to be intentionally?
> 
> I don't believe it is intentional, no.  Sean can you look at this and
> see what's up?  I have a couple of fixes to queue up from you already
> and if you can get this one done in the next few days I'll included it
> as well.
> 
> josh

The current community ndfc driver won't build for arch/powerpc.
It still uses ioremap64 and includes <asm/ibm4xx.h> stuff.

Valentine.

Re: platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Sean MacLennan]

For those who are interested, I have posted a patch for the ndfc
driver. This is the driver we use un-bogusitize the warp-nand ;)

I removed the CONFIG_PPC_MERGE defines, but other than that this is the
driver we use in production.

Stefan: This has the byte order reversing that I believe you where
going to look into wrt u-boot. This may need to be a config option.

Cheers,
   Sean

Re: platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Sean MacLennan]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 11:26:28 -0400
"Josh Boyer" <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> I don't believe it is intentional, no.  Sean can you look at this and
> see what's up?  I have a couple of fixes to queue up from you already
> and if you can get this one done in the next few days I'll included it
> as well.

So I went back in the archives. Somebody else, Thomas Gleixner I
believe, was already working on the ndfc port. So, since I *had* to
have a working ndfc, I put a local copy in my kernel and forgot about
it.

It looks like Thomas has dropped the port. I should probably resubmit
the patch with the arch/ppc code removed. However, I don't think this
would be for 2.6.27 timeframe since there will probably be discussion.
For one, my patch just gets it working... the warp-nand.c file shows
that it is not a complete solution ;) Second, there are some byte order
issues.

So could we just leave warp-nand.c "there but disabled" for now?

Cheers,
   Sean

Re: platforms/44x/warp-nand.c bogosity

[Sean MacLennan]

On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 18:14:01 +0300
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

> arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp-nand.c was added this year and
> updated quite recently.
> 
> warp-nand.c is empty unless CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NDFC=y.
> 
> MTD_NAND_NDFC depends on !PPC_MERGE.
> 
> !PPC_MERGE can never be true on PPC now that arch/ppc/ got removed.
> 
> So warp-nand.c is dead code, but that does not seem to be
> intentionally?

I use a local copy of ndfc.c that was modified to work with
arch/powerpc. I submitted the patch, but it was never accepted into the
kernel, and to be honest I don't remember why. I will look into this.

So the code is definitely not dead. You can't realistically run a warp
without the NAND.

Cheers,
   Sean