linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean MacLennan <smaclennan@pikatech.com>
To: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC] Driver helper functions.....
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:22:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080807122242.63a9f156@lappy.seanm.ca> (raw)

The design of the warp is basically a processor, an FPGA, some RAM,
some flash, and some glue logic. As the number of drivers rapidly
expands... we are starting to hit inter-driver conflicts with a select
few FPGA registers.

So we need a few "helper" functions to handle locking. Basically
something like this:

static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(fpga_lock);

void warp_fpga_set_imr(imr)
{ /* imr = interrupt mask register */
	lock
	read/modify/write imr
	unlock
}

void warp_fpga_clear_imr(imr);
int warp_fpga_indirect_read();
int warp_fpga_indirect_write();

Maybe a couple more, but I think it would basically be four functions.

So I see a few solutions:

1) Write an fpga driver. That seems overkill for basically exporting
four functions.

2) Add a non-static spinlock to the platform code and export that. This
adds minimal code to the platform code but gives eveybody a lock that
is always there.

3) Add the above functions to the platform code.

So my questions are, what would be best practice? Would adding the
functions and/or spinlock to the platform code be kosher?

And if I did add the spinlock and/or functions to the platform code,
where would I put the include file to export them from? In the arch
code itself? i.e. arch/powerpc/platforms/44x/warp.h?

Cheers,
   Sean

                 reply	other threads:[~2008-08-07 16:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080807122242.63a9f156@lappy.seanm.ca \
    --to=smaclennan@pikatech.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).