From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.229]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703C3DDF9E for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:11:39 +1000 (EST) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2729238rvb.9 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 00:11:35 -0600 From: Grant Likely To: Tim Yamin Subject: Re: [PATCH]: [MPC5200] Add ATA DMA support Message-ID: <20080813061135.GH17587@secretlab.ca> References: <792f5f410808120643md72e679o39692c4bfa3f285e@mail.gmail.com> <792f5f410808120730j7b4be4f2n7a40de880178ccca@mail.gmail.com> <792f5f410808120830v311e0446kc8fddfb97d0b9ea6@mail.gmail.com> <792f5f410808122257t3711eb2lfc1e02bacade16a3@mail.gmail.com> <792f5f410808122306u478b3ere8167016ef892323@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <792f5f410808122306u478b3ere8167016ef892323@mail.gmail.com> Sender: Grant Likely Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 07:06:27AM +0100, Tim Yamin wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Grant Likely wrote: > > While on this topic; have you had a chance to address the comments you > > received on v2 of your patch? I'm keen to get your change merged in, > > but there are a few more things that need to be sorted out. > > I'm still trying to determine whether the locking stuff is needed or > not. I think ultimately it might be a bug caused by hardware problems > at this end as opposed to silicon problems affecting everybody, but I > won't have an answer regarding this for a while because new hardware > needs to be prototyped to test out this theory. > > I think the patch can probably be resubmitted with the locking stuff > removed, and the driver can be marked as experimental for everybody to > try out: if people experience any corruption problems I'm sure they > can speak up :-) > > Any objections? Sounds good to me. You will get more testers that way. I can pick it up for -next if everything else looks good. g.