From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "e1.ny.us.ibm.com", Issuer "Equifax" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A4DFDDE98 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 10:37:27 +1000 (EST) Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7L0bOk7013250 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:37:24 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (d01av03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.217]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.0) with ESMTP id m7L0bOpd214460 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:37:24 -0400 Received: from d01av03.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av03.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m7L0bNnp008178 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:37:24 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:37:19 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [RFC] mtd: add OF2PDEV convertor for the NDFC driver Message-ID: <20080820203719.5224dc78@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <200808210040.58809.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20080820205958.GA13371@www.tglx.de> <200808210040.58809.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Sebastian Siewior , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, Sean MacLennan List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:40:58 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 20 August 2008, Sebastian Siewior wrote: > > I didn't convert the NDFC driver to support OF because there are > > non-OF-aware platforms with the ndfc chip. > > All settings are mandatory except the oob layout. > > Are you aware of Sean's patch from > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/linuxppc/patch?id=20183 ? I need to look at that hard for .28 still. > What are the other platforms using it? There should be none. It was an arch/ppc driver originally, and arch/ppc is dead. Since it's only found on 4xx SoCs, there's no reason that I'm aware of to keep it as a platform driver. Other than the fact that the whole of_platform thing might be replaced with shims to convert them to platform devices. There was talk of that at one time and it made sense to me. josh