From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com
Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping().
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:59:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080821.145946.01710005.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821215611.GA14354@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:56:11 +0400
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 12:10:17AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > @@ -96,6 +96,14 @@ static inline void of_node_put(struct device_node *node)
> > {
> > }
> >
> > +/* These routines are here to provide compatibility with how powerpc
> > + * handles IRQ mapping for OF device nodes. We precompute and permanently
> > + * register them in the of_device objects, whereas powerpc computes them
> > + * on request.
> > + */
> > +extern int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index);
>
> On powerpc irq_of_parse_and_map() returns unsigned type.
>
> > +#define irq_dispose_mapping(irq) do { } while (0)
>
> I'd rather write it as a static inline function, for type checking,
> plus, I think with this macros gcc may generate warnings about
> defined but unused variables.
Thanks, I'll fix that.
> > +
> > /*
> > * NB: This is here while we transition from using asm/prom.h
> > * to linux/of.h
> > diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> > index cc4c235..56e9a71 100644
> > --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/of_device.c
> > @@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ struct of_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *dp)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_device_by_node);
> >
> > +int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *node, int index)
> > +{
> > + struct of_device *op = of_find_device_by_node(node);
> > +
> > + if (!op || index >= op->num_irqs)
> > + return 0xffffffff;
>
> This is valid virq, unfortunately. There is only one invalid virq: 0.
> With this most drivers will fail to identify 'there is no irq' case.
> Does virq0 has special meaning on sparc?
No, I'll fix this up, thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-21 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-21 7:10 [PATCH 1/3]: sparc: Implement irq_of_parse_and_map() and irq_dispose_mapping() David Miller
2008-08-21 21:56 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-08-21 21:59 ` David Miller [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-22 4:21 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080821.145946.01710005.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).