From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 06:50:48 -0400 From: Josh Boyer To: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support. Message-ID: <20080822065048.662e3f8e@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20080821.205305.74123372.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080821.163216.239892875.davem@davemloft.net> <1219367743.26429.66.camel@jdub.homelinux.org> <20080821.205305.74123372.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, scottwood@freescale.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:53:05 -0700 (PDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Josh Boyer > Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:15:37 -0400 > > > Huge? I'd say mistake, but not necessarily huge. I mean nobody other > > than you (at least in the context of this conversation) had access to > > the IEEE1275 proposed binding so it wasn't like there was tons to go on. > > I guess all the PowerMAC G5 systems out there and their device trees > were locked up in a highly secure vault somewhere :-) Apple has done silly things in their device trees before. I wouldn't hold them up as an excellent example. > > Have patience with the embedded people that are both new to > > OpenFirmware and trying to make stuff work at the same time. I > > think the devicetree-discuss list will help here as new bindings are > > proposed. I hope you're subscribed. > > Why not ask the people who actually work on the standards? That's who > I go to when I want to know something about openfirmware issues. Honestly, I don't know. And from what I can tell, there _aren't_ people who actively work on the standards anymore. Mitch is active elsewhere and could be a great resource but aside from him I have no idea who to contact. josh