From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from protonic.prtnl (protonic.xs4all.nl [213.84.116.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D538DDE08 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:30:10 +1000 (EST) From: David Jander To: munroesj@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: Efficient memcpy()/memmove() for G2/G3 cores... Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 10:29:22 +0200 References: <200808251131.02071.david.jander@protonic.nl> <200808291348.27652.david.jander@protonic.nl> <1220042061.28869.184.camel@spokane1.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1220042061.28869.184.camel@spokane1.rchland.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200809011029.23413.david.jander@protonic.nl> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Friday 29 August 2008 22:34:21 Steven Munroe wrote: > > I am not complaining. I was only wondering if it is just me or there > > really is very little that has been done (for either uClibc, glibc, or > > whatever for powerpc) to improve performance of (linux-) applications on > > "lower"-power platforms (G2 core), AFAICS there is a LOT that can be > > gained by simple tweaks. > > This is a self help group (free as in freedom) We help each other. And > you can help yourself. There is no free lunch. I never expected to be served a free dish of any kind on a mailing-list ;-) I was just asking around, to avoid reinventing wheels, since I intend to dig into this problem, that's all. My intention never was to pick up work from others and then run. > > The problem is: I have very little experience with powerpc assembly and > > only very limited time to dedicate to this and I am looking for others > > who have > > Well this will be a good learning experience for you. We will try to > answer questions. Excellent. I love learning new stuff ;-) Thanks a lot for the guidance so far... Regards, -- David Jander