From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [140.211.169.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.linux-foundation.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C5CDDDF73 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 14:41:22 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:41:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc5-mm1 mystery trace Message-Id: <20080904214115.2b4ab5fd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1220589401.4879.125.camel@pasglop> References: <20080904202032.2299c2c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1220586164.4879.116.camel@pasglop> <20080904204957.04a420ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1220589401.4879.125.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:36:41 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 20:49 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:42:44 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > > This is stupid: > > > > > > > > g5:/usr/src/25> gdb vmlinux > > > > GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.3.0.0-1.21rh) > > > > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are > > > > welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. > > > > Type "show copying" to see the conditions. > > > > There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. > > > > This GDB was configured as "ppc-yellowdog-linux-gnu"..."/usr/src/25/vmlinux": not in executable format: File format not recognized > > > > > > > > probably there's some command line magic to make it work, but there > > > > shouldn't be. > > > > > > Is this a 64 bits gdb ? > > > > > > > I don't think so - it's whatever ydl4.1 gave me. > > > > A 64-bit binary on a 64-bit machine Should Just Work. Maybe that's > > me being simplistic. > > But is it a 64 bits binary ? > vmlinux? Yup. According to file(1).