From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr (ecfrec.frec.bull.fr [129.183.4.8]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23397DDF53 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:31:59 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 14:31:46 +0200 From: Sebastien Dugue To: Christoph Raisch Subject: Re: [PATCH HACK] powerpc: quick hack to get a functional eHEA with hardirq preemption, eHCA is close Message-ID: <20080918143146.77db81d5@bull.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20080915100406.342e027a@bull.net> <20080918112713.75872c95@bull.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Thomas Q Klein , tinytim@us.ibm.com, Linux-rt , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, jean-pierre.dion@bull.net, linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Hoang-Nam Nguyen , gilles.carry@ext.bull.net List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:42:05 +0200 Christoph Raisch wrote: > > Sebastien Dugue wrote on 18.09.2008 11:27:13: > > > > > It would be really interresting to know if the eHCA exhibits the same > > problem under -rt as it's the only other user of the ibmebus. > > Unfortunately I don't have the hardware to test. > > > > eHCA is very close from the interrupt generation and handling perspective, > so yes, could be an issue there as well. That's what I was speculating. Thanks, Sebastien. > > > Gruss / Regards > Christoph Raisch > > >