From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, i2c@lm-sensors.org,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: expand I2C's id.name to 23 characters
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:03:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080919220308.3173320e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080919180339.GA13899@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:03:39 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> It was discussed[1] that we should match on the first (most specific)
> entry in the device tree.
>
> The most lengthy I2C compatible entry for the MPC8349E-mITX MCU
> devices is "mc9s08qg8-mpc8349emitx" (w/o vendor name). This means
> that we have to allow longer IDs to be used in the I2C subsystem.
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org/msg21196.html
Nack. Just come up with shorter names. "mc9s08qg8-mpc8349emitx" is
simply too long to start with. Looking at the mcu_mpc8349emitx driver
you just submitted, you are clearly abusing the i2c client name to pass
platform-specific information, and that's bad. I'm not even sure why
you do that, given that all the names are then handled the same as far
as I can see.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mod_devicetable.h | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> index c4db582..9d9d1f5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ struct virtio_device_id {
>
> /* i2c */
>
> -#define I2C_NAME_SIZE 20
> +#define I2C_NAME_SIZE 23
> #define I2C_MODULE_PREFIX "i2c:"
>
> struct i2c_device_id {
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-19 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 18:03 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: expand I2C's id.name to 23 characters Anton Vorontsov
2008-09-19 20:03 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2008-09-19 20:39 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080919220308.3173320e@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
--cc=i2c@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).