From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:53:44 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: Merge linuxppc-embedded with linuxppc-dev Message-ID: <20080923045344.GA14897@pengutronix.de> References: <200809230909.12785.jk@ozlabs.org> <4078F175-8422-42CC-8145-333D1362CEFE@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM" In-Reply-To: <4078F175-8422-42CC-8145-333D1362CEFE@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: linuxppc-dev , Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:34:37PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Can we eliminate the linuxppc-embedded mailing list and merge it with >>> linuxppc-dev? >> >> That's not really up to me - more of a community question I think. I >> imagine Paul would have the final decision though. > > I'm pretty sure I saw paul gripe about this on irc just the other day. > > My vote is to kill linuxppc-embedded. I also think one list will suffice nowadays. Wolfram --=20 Dipl.-Ing. Wolfram Sang | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkjYdlgACgkQD27XaX1/VRu3OACfWzyckAO0YR/IM0TbUll1AJ8G zngAoJ+f5dT/nAF1VrF9GbTv0J50WwDU =7SSs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--