From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC5200 PCI interrupt routing
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:57:55 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080925165755.GB16018@secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200809250951.15941.jbe@pengutronix.de>
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 09:51:14AM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Benjamin,
>
> On Mittwoch, 24. September 2008, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-09-24 at 12:15 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 05:16:34PM +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > > On Dienstag, 23. September 2008, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> > > > > What Kernel do you run on your target? On my hardware a 2.6.23 still
> > > > > work as expected, but a 2.6.26 fails all the time.
> > > >
> > > > One should enable the internal USB clock. If done, it works... In
> > > > 2.6.23 is was done in mpc52xx_common.c. It was removed in 2.6.24.
> > >
> > > It was removed because some 5200 platform do not use USB and should not
> > > enable the internal clock. In general, it is not the kernel's job to
> > > configure clocking and pin usage on the chip. Instead, it should be set
> > > correctly at power up by U-Boot.
> >
> > Or by the USB host driver :-)
>
> But how to deal with platform specific things like (in this case) unknown
> external clock or usage of the internal clock generator (= how to setup the
> frequency divider)?
The external clock would need to be encoded in the device tree.
Internal clock would need to read/detect the CDM config and make a
decision based on that. Certainly possible, but I just don't think that
it is really important. (And even if it is, I think it should be done
in common platform setup code, not the driver, because it is very
MPC5200 SoC specific).
g.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-25 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-22 13:56 MPC5200 PCI interrupt routing Juergen Beisert
2008-09-22 15:12 ` Juergen Beisert
2008-09-22 21:01 ` Matt Sealey
2008-09-23 11:34 ` Juergen Beisert
2008-09-24 15:16 ` Juergen Beisert
2008-09-24 18:15 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-24 21:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-24 21:34 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-25 7:51 ` Juergen Beisert
2008-09-25 8:34 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-09-25 16:57 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2008-09-25 18:02 ` Jon Smirl
2008-09-25 18:12 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-25 16:54 ` Grant Likely
2008-09-25 21:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080925165755.GB16018@secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).